综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-20 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang speaks at the Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing, Dec 22, 2015.[Photo/Xinhua]

A DRAFT AMENDMENT to the 2008 regulation on government information disclosure has been issued by the State Council, China's Cabinet, to solicit public opinions. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Monday:

It is praiseworthy that the draft does not shun questions over the increasing public calls for government information and the obligation of government organs to disclose it.

The constant disclosure "tussle" between people who want to know more about local governance and civil servants wary of divulging sensitive information has, in fact, found expression in the making and revision of relevant legal codes.

That explains why the latest draft reiterates the principle that government information disclosure should be the norm and nondisclosure exceptional. For that to have teeth, legislative revisions are needed to clarify what is eligible for disclosure and what is not.

There should be little controversy over the information subject to specially designed laws and regulations that is not to be made public under any circumstances. On the other hand, government information that risks "endangering national security, economic security, and social stability", yet can be disclosed in the appropriate circumstances, is often inaccessible.

The draft amendment is right to clarify that the disclosure, if deemed by same-level local governments as a potential threat to public security and social stability or the implementation of key financial policies, will not have to be made.

The vague wording and the lack of concrete criteria, however, may leave room for government departments not to make public information that they should. What constitutes potential security threats and the same-level governments' authority in deciding what to disclose, is not set out clearly enough to convince people that the right to withhold critical information is not being abused. Public supervision of government may be kept at bay in this way.

Making public government information is now a step that cannot be taken back. The disclosure of government information may be better decided by the top legislative body, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, rather than the governments themselves.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
青浦区| 柳河县| 呼伦贝尔市| 黄龙县| 金寨县| 临桂县| 桐乡市| 永德县| 定安县| 乌什县| 广饶县| 革吉县| 东丰县| 延吉市| 剑河县| 志丹县| 望谟县| 丰台区| 策勒县| 施秉县| 九龙坡区| 长宁区| 姜堰市| 会泽县| 新源县| 棋牌| 城固县| 安徽省| 安塞县| 沁阳市| 房产| 上高县| 壤塘县| 景宁| 启东市| 新建县| 高青县| 和林格尔县| 马尔康县| 阳信县| 广宗县|