综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
HongKong Comment(1)

'Academic freedom' not license to incite

HK Edition | Updated: 2017-08-25 06:47
Share
Share - WeChat

The jailing of young activists Joshua Wong Chi-fung, Alex Chow Yong-kang and Nathan Law Kwun-chung last week by the Court of Appeal has no doubt saddened many. This includes the compassionate judge Wally Yeung Chun-kuen himself, who admitted it was difficult to put young people with aspirations behind bars. It is not hard to understand why the public are now looking forward to the court giving a justified punishment to the initiators and masterminds behind the illegal "Occupy Central" campaign.

There is perhaps one bit of comfort for those who have transformed their empathy for the jailed young men to anger at the initiators of the illegal movement. The District Court will hear the case of Benny Tai Yiu-ting, Chan Kin-man and Chu Yiu-ming on Sept 19 after the three were arrested and charged for their roles in the 79-day street protest that brought some key parts of Hong Kong to a standstill in fall of 2014. The trio each faces three counts related to causing a public nuisance.

It is the business of the court to decide whether the three are guilty or not. But it is the business of Hong Kong to keep our educational institutions, particularly the city's top universities, free from political demagogues. By inciting young people to deliberately violate the law and misguiding students to undermine the rule of law - the cornerstone of Hong Kong's economic prosperity and social stability - those demagogues are deemed by many unfit to continue teaching in university.

Voices urging the removal of those demagogues from their posts in the universities and other educational institutions are growing. The top administrators of those institutions have so far refrained from taking action despite the rising public pressure. This is presumably because of fears that they might be accused of obstructing academic freedom.

But they might have erred on the side of caution. What those demagogues did that led to the disruptive and lengthy street protests in the fall of 2014 has nothing to do with academic activities but everything to do with infringing upon the rights of thousands of innocent citizens and undermining the rule of law.

Maneuvers such as drafting the action plan for the "Occupy" campaign and publishing articles and delivering speeches that incite people to participate in the illegal protests are definitely not part of academic freedom. This unmistakably refers to "the freedom of teachers and students to teach, study, and pursue knowledge and research without unreasonable interference or restriction from law, institutional regulations, or public pressure", according to Encyclopedia Britannica.

(HK Edition 08/25/2017 page12)

Today's Top News

Editor's picks

Most Viewed

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
渝中区| 保德县| 汶川县| 普格县| 长岭县| 博湖县| 毕节市| 宝坻区| 长子县| 调兵山市| 竹山县| 莱州市| 黄梅县| 柯坪县| 瑞金市| 武邑县| 岗巴县| 平果县| 靖宇县| 乌苏市| 青岛市| 孝义市| 房产| 荣成市| 乳山市| 屏东县| 沭阳县| 兴化市| 汉沽区| 龙海市| 深州市| 卫辉市| 巨野县| 三原县| 鸡泽县| 健康| 韩城市| 虞城县| 苏尼特左旗| 禄丰县| 永新县|