综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

Washington is asking Asia-Pacific to pay the price for isolating China: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2022-02-15 19:30
Share
Share - WeChat
File photo shows the White House and a stop sign in Washington DC, the United States. [Photo/Xinhua]

In the Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States it released on Friday, the Joe Biden administration has notably proposed an Indo-Pacific economic framework. The harm that such a politically driven economic initiative can do to the region and beyond calls for the attention of all stakeholders.

Under the framework, the US will seek to set new standards and raise the thresholds for trade, investment and cooperation in technology and industry. All of these actions are targeted at reshuffling the current Indo-Pacific economic and trade cooperation mode with the aim of isolating China.

The framework envisioned by the Biden administration is more comprehensive than those of the Barack Obama and Donald Trump administrations. Both of which tried to set up a US-centered trade framework in the Indo-Pacific that excluded China.

Yet despite their lower requirements in comparison with the one the Biden administration has proposed, neither of those frameworks actually materialized, not only because of the caprice of the Trump administration, but more importantly because doing so would mean taking a wrecking ball to the existing economic framework in the region.

That framework has proved its worth over the past more than four decades, enabling the Asia-Pacific region to develop into a world growth engine.

Japan, the Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand and Association of Southeast Asian Nations members all have close trade, economic and people-to-people connections with China. The US administration should know their nodding to its solicitations that they jump on the bandwagon of the new Indo-Pacific economic framework it proposes might reflect a few politicians' eagerness to curry favor with it, if not the effects of the US' coercion and intimidation.

But that does not mean it is the true inclinations of the nations, which are in multiple free trade and investment deals with each other and China. They are not going to tear these up simply to please Washington.

For them, cooperation with China and the rest of the world is largely based on a multilateral system with the World Trade Organization rules as the foundation; the arrangement the US has unveiled is fundamentally a US-centered system and they would have to surrender their initiative, if not their core data and technologies, to the US. The question is how many countries will bet their future on the US sharing the benefits.

Like those of its predecessors, the Biden administration's bid to impose a new system on the region is doomed to fail. But regional countries should be vigilant to the increasing possibility of the US trying to shatter the existing supply and value chains in pursuit of that goal, since it is the region that will end up paying the price.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
广宁县| 田阳县| 汕头市| 富民县| 土默特左旗| 东辽县| 凌海市| 紫阳县| 会同县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 锡林浩特市| 江津市| 临猗县| 七台河市| 昌平区| 阿拉善左旗| 大姚县| 景谷| 庐江县| 肥城市| 南澳县| 江永县| 阳东县| 扶沟县| 通化市| 丰台区| 宾川县| 淅川县| 罗源县| 宁晋县| 克东县| 龙陵县| 彭泽县| 禄丰县| 宁城县| 涡阳县| 洪泽县| 清水河县| 永吉县| 峨山| 平果县|