综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

US federal judge sides with Harvard in lawsuit over Trump administration funding freeze

Xinhua | Updated: 2025-09-04 09:30
Share
Share - WeChat

WASHINGTON -- A US federal judge on Wednesday sided with Harvard University in a lawsuit against the Trump administration, ruling that the federal government illegally froze billions of dollars in research funds.

Allison Burroughs, judge of the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts, wrote in a ruling that "Defendants (US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Justice) used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically-motivated assault on this country's premier universities."

On April 11, Trump administration officials sent a letter to Harvard, demanding that the university eliminate antisemitism on campus and dismantle diversity initiatives that favor certain minority groups.

The Trump administration "did so in a way that runs afoul of" the Administrative Procedure Act, the First Amendment of the US Constitution, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, wrote the ruling.

On April 14, after Harvard rejected the administration's demands, the Trump administration announced a freeze on 2.2 billion dollars in multi-year grants and 60 million dollars in multi-year contract value to the university.

"We must fight against antisemitism, but we equally need to protect our rights, including our right to free speech, and neither goal should nor needs to be sacrificed on the altar of the other," wrote Burroughs.

Noting that Harvard "was wrong to tolerate hateful behavior for as long as it did," the judge wrote that "Harvard is currently, even if belatedly, taking steps it needs to take to combat antisemitism and seems willing to do even more if need be."

"Now it is the job of the courts to similarly step up, to act to safeguard academic freedom and freedom of speech as required by the Constitution, and to ensure that important research is not improperly subjected to arbitrary and procedurally infirm grant terminations, even if doing so risks the wrath of a government committed to its agenda no matter the cost," Burroughs wrote.

The judge granted a motion for summary judgment, which means she has ruled in favor of Harvard without a trial.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
逊克县| 进贤县| 皋兰县| 南投县| 濉溪县| 天峨县| 正宁县| 新沂市| 松原市| 兖州市| 丹巴县| 东安县| 虞城县| 台东县| 赣州市| 米脂县| 上高县| 杨浦区| 巴林左旗| 牙克石市| 齐河县| 凭祥市| 友谊县| 历史| 信宜市| 义乌市| 隆子县| 郎溪县| 贵州省| 巴里| 巩义市| 陆良县| 正安县| 仙游县| 晋州市| 安丘市| 耒阳市| 五指山市| 台中县| 庆城县| 弥渡县|