综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

BIZCHINA> Review & Analysis
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-08-17 15:21

Since late July, the European Union (EU) has launched a series of anti-dumping actions against Chinese products, covering steel wire rod, seamless steel tubes, sodium gluconate, steel cables and aluminum road wheels.

With five cases in just three weeks, such a frequent use of anti-dumping probes and punitive duties has been unprecedented. The EU's unusual move has raised wide concern, especially when the world economy is in recession due to the financial crisis.

The EU said its decisions were taken against "unfair" trade practices of some Chinese companies, but it has so far provided no convincing evidence for its allegations.

Take as an example the case of aluminum road wheels, against which the EU started an anti-dumping probe on Thursday. The prices of China's wheels exported to the EU were much higher than in its domestic market. Is it logical for any Chinese manufacturers to "dump" their products at a loss on European markets thousands of miles away?

As by definition, dumping is the act of a manufacturer exporting a product to foreign markets at a price either lower than home market prices or below production costs.

Yet, there are indeed unfair practices. That is on the EU part. The EU has refused to disclose the list of European companies which had lodged the complaints from the very beginning when it started anti-dumping probe into Chinese aluminum road wheels.

Related readings:
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU EU launches investigation of Chinese steel rope, cable
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU EU should resist protectionism temptation
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU China files WTO complaint on EU anti-dumping measures
EU anti-dumping abuse harms both China, EU China steel imports face 24% EU duties

This violates the principle of transparency under the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and the specific regulation of the WTO anti-dumping agreement.

Such an approach is unfair to Chinese companies as it deprives them of their vital right of defense. Besides, under EU anti-dumping rules, an investigation is not to be initiated unless the complainants represent at least 25 percent of the total EU output of the products in question. Is this fair trade practice when the EU pushes aside its own rule in its anti-dumping probe against Chinese companies?

The EU has so far refused to recognize China's market economy status. Instead, it chose Turkey as a substitute country to calculate Chinese companies' cost of producing the aluminum wheels. As a result, China was accused of dumping goods to Europe at an unreasonably low price.

But the choice is arbitrary and unfair to Chinese companies as there is no real comparison between China and Turkey in terms of economic reality or development of their relevant sectors.


(For more biz stories, please visit Industries)

   Previous page 1 2 Next Page  

 

 

自贡市| 响水县| 绥德县| 海门市| 永新县| 什邡市| 西宁市| 海南省| 邓州市| 永济市| 抚远县| 寿阳县| 元阳县| 射阳县| 胶州市| 永清县| 阿拉善左旗| 鄂伦春自治旗| 巨野县| 湘潭市| 德安县| 永州市| 永安市| 富源县| 普兰县| 苏尼特右旗| 新泰市| 湘乡市| 临沭县| 恩平市| 大余县| 嵊泗县| 平陆县| 仲巴县| 潼南县| 辽源市| 丹江口市| 香港| 盐池县| 吉首市| 大姚县|