综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Make me your Homepage
left corner left corner
China Daily Website

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23
By Mark Williams (China Daily)

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

(China Daily 12/13/2012 page9)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

 
 
...
合肥市| 天门市| 永康市| 深州市| 静宁县| 余干县| 延安市| 黄山市| 杭锦后旗| 康定县| 郯城县| 长乐市| 怀仁县| 教育| 乐平市| 舒兰市| 喀喇| 元朗区| 凉城县| 尤溪县| 佳木斯市| 富裕县| 永州市| 无极县| 玉门市| 乌什县| 旺苍县| 广元市| 冕宁县| 即墨市| 平罗县| 齐河县| 东乌| 龙江县| 大关县| 含山县| 丽江市| 且末县| 临洮县| 喜德县| 寿宁县|