综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Finance

IPO reforms draw skepticism in some quarters

By Yang Ziman | China Daily | Updated: 2013-07-24 07:20

To guarantee fair pricing, the CSRC reform states that individual investors should be included in the price-setting process.

At least 20 individual or institutional investors are required for issues of less than 400 million shares. At least 50 such investors are required for larger issues.

Xiong Jinqiu, a financial expert, said the reform proposals place too much emphasis on prevention rather than punishment.

Overpriced new issues will only be temporarily suspended, at best. For instance, when new share prices rose last year, the CSRC concluded after a brief investigation that prices were being pushed up by many individual shareholders.

It did not occur to the commission, Xiong said, that the individuals might be acting collectively on behalf of a "price-rigging mastermind".

Since IPO reform no longer produces significant results, said Xiong, the CSRC should instead take tough steps to crack down on secondary market price manipulation to end fraudulent behavior.

The draft reforms also said that applicants waiting for IPO approval could issue bonds in the meantime to diversify their financing sources. Once approval is obtained, companies can choose the timing of the issue on their own.

Abolishing 'redline'

Further, the proposed reforms abolish the "25 percent" redline. According to IPO policies that prevailed last year, if the price-earnings ratio of the IPO is 25 percent higher than for comparable companies, the issuer must call a board meeting and submit an explanation to the CSRC. In that situation, the commission could order the issuer to reset the IPO price. Now, issuers would only have to release an explanation for the above-average prices and warn investors of potential risks.

Some analysts see the entire reform package as nothing more than tinkering with technical problems. Hua Sheng, a veteran economist and president of the Beijing Yanjing Overseas Chinese University, said that the proposal does not touch the most important issue - approval rights. The decision on conducting an IPO remains in the hands of the CSRC, rather than the market.

Lin Yixiang, chair of Beijing-based TX Investment Consulting, agreed with Hua's opinion that the reform sidesteps the question of "who decides who can go public". If the approval process remains the same, it is hard to make any breakthroughs.

Hua and Lin suggest the regulatory should loosen its control and leave it to the issuers and buyers themselves to decide when to go public, at whatever price, and whether or not the stocks are worth buying.

Xiong, however, is against the idea of loosening administrative power prematurely. The mainland stock market is still in its infancy, he said, and without CSRC oversight, issuers wouldn't wait to go public at any time, regardless of market conditions. This is because once listed, issuers have many prerogatives.

When companies see the stock market as an ideal place to rip off ignorant investors, lack of government involvement will do more harm than good.

Apart from increasing the accountability of issuers and underwriters, Ke Jingmin, a financial commentator, said the regulator itself should assume more responsibility.

Based on the principle of "with power comes responsibility", the CSRC must be accountable for giving the green light to IPO applicants who are later involved in fraudulent conduct.

The current system misleads investors into believing that companies that passed the CSRC's approval process are trustworthy, Ke said.

However, scandals such as those involving Green-land Biological Technology and Wanfu Biotechnology demonstrate that the CSRC's endorsement can't necessarily be relied on. The agency needs to be responsible for any approval it is going to grant, Ke added.

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
阜宁县| 鄂托克前旗| 仁化县| 益阳市| 民乐县| 普安县| 大田县| 兴业县| 肃北| 尼玛县| 建宁县| 广昌县| 洛扎县| 田林县| 桐城市| 大同县| 军事| 沙坪坝区| 张掖市| 通化市| 施甸县| 新沂市| 怀集县| 社会| 扎赉特旗| 遂宁市| 疏勒县| 河间市| 通辽市| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 民乐县| 东乡| 盐亭县| 济阳县| 诸暨市| 建昌县| 衡阳县| 合作市| 五大连池市| 台湾省| 内黄县|