综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Trade    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Anti-monopoly rules should be expanded


2004-05-28
China Daily

It is great to be your industry's dominant leader - unless you take advantage of that role to muscle your competitors aside and blackmail consumers.

According to the fair trade bureau of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC), some foreign business giants are doing that in China.

A report by the bureau says some multinationals command dominant positions in their industries in China and use that position to block competition.

Among the accused are such big names as Microsoft and Eastman Kodak.

People usually admire those who stand out from market competition through fair means based on technological advantages and business strategies. That is why the antitrust case brought by the US Department of Justice against Microsoft has incurred so many controversies.

In China, however, things are different this time.

There is no law governing monopoly practices. However, the SAIC is not making a fuss. The investigation took one year to find the irregularities of some multinationals in China.

According to the report, some multinational companies use unfair pricing and deals to safeguard their monopolies.

Some sell products below cost to squeeze out Chinese competitors and others set prices in China higher than in other countries in order to make exorbitant profits.

Others buy the exclusive promotion rights of supermarkets during busy seasons, telling them to sideline other brands or face losing deals.

All this shows that those accused companies are making use of their monopoly at the sacrifice of competitors and consumers.

Existing laws lack provisions against practices that curb competition, such as selling tie-in goods, setting unfair prices to subdue competitors and price discrimination. This calls for either revision of those laws or drafting of a new unified antitrust law to keep market order and protect consumers.

China has been moving steadily toward breaking domestic monopolies, an example of which is its aviation industrial reform. Other sectors, such as power, railway and oil and gas, however, are dragging their feet in their reform.

The new legal framework, while governing multinational monopolizers, should also hold domestic companies accountable.

 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by www.gdqibao.cn. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
大姚县| 磴口县| 富蕴县| 孟州市| 睢宁县| 政和县| 吉林省| 富平县| 尼玛县| 定安县| 广东省| 乌兰浩特市| 凭祥市| 濮阳市| 永福县| 吉木乃县| 南昌市| 峨眉山市| 苍南县| 固始县| 汝阳县| 宜丰县| 噶尔县| 杂多县| 文昌市| 永嘉县| 大石桥市| 曲麻莱县| 辉县市| 瑞丽市| 朝阳区| 齐河县| 林芝县| 河北省| 六安市| 永泰县| 保定市| 疏附县| 宜阳县| 尖扎县| 平顶山市|