综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Potential Risks in Local Government Investment and Financing Platforms Call for Transformation

2017-02-17

 

By Xu Pengcheng, DRC

2016-12-29

For a long time, local government investment and financing platform companies have played an important role in China’s economic growth whereas their development is accompanied with potential risks. As a result, it is a major and imminent task to make transformation of these platform companies.

First, current performance. To resist financial crisis in 2008 and boost local economy, local governments in China are encouraged to establish platform companies to attract banking credit, issue corporate bonds and medium-term notes and broaden financing channels by financial appropriations, land-use right transfer and equity investment. According to the motions made at the National People’s Congress and the report by the Ministry of Finance, the debt balance of local governments across the country reached respectively 16 trillion yuan in 2014 and 17.18 trillion yuan in 2016.

Second, main existing problems. 1. Inappropriate functions have left these companies vulnerable in independent management if the government does not provide support. They lack clear debt liability and are overloaded in operation. 2. Internal management is not standardized, including the composition of personnel, sources of funds and governance structure. 3. Inability in debt payment due to land revenue decline and a long cycle of fund return. 4. Improper regulations for company performance. 5. Imperfect legal systems. 6. Great difficulties in local debt-to-equity swap.

Third, existing risks. 1. Single source of funds and dependence on land revenue will trigger financial risks for platform companies. 2. The non-standardized credit rating and loan audit will lead to bank credit risks. 3. Local governments would bear financial risks as debtors and guarantors. 4. Economic fluctuations often exert a leverage effect in debts. Meanwhile, as important assets are often associated with land mortgage, local governments would have to push up housing prices, thus resulting in economic structural malformations.

 

For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
蚌埠市| 固安县| 扎兰屯市| 乌拉特前旗| 鹤岗市| 赫章县| 阜城县| 呼和浩特市| 额敏县| 措美县| 盐池县| 广宁县| 乐山市| 武夷山市| 建宁县| 呼玛县| 探索| 紫金县| 交城县| 蕲春县| 贡山| 赣州市| 海淀区| 九江市| 昆山市| 金堂县| 文安县| 扶余县| 富阳市| 淄博市| 河源市| 麻江县| 大荔县| 禄丰县| 镇原县| 万州区| 乳山市| 五家渠市| 射洪县| 固阳县| 大邑县|