综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Reports

The Evaluation of Officials’ Performance in the New Era: Challenges and Countermeasures (No.20, 2019)

2019-04-09

By Li Yaokun & Hu Xiao, Research Team on “The Target Requirement and Strategic Issues on High-Quality Development”, DRC

Research Report, No.20, 2019 (Total 5520) 2019-2-26

Abstract: Since reform and opening up, China's evaluation work relating to officials' performance has gradually shifted its focus from the GDP-oriented results to the scientific development-based appraisal that gives preference to quality, benefits and sustainability. The evaluation used to lay stress on the performance of officials, including leading members at various levels on an annual basis, while now a systematic evaluation system is targeted at the fulfillment of their duties and job performance in light of their respective office positions in a more scientific and precise manner. As China's social and economic growth is now focused on high-quality-oriented development, the existing evaluation system is facing some prominent problems such as the mismatch between performance standard and development concepts in the new era, the inadequacy between evaluation content and evaluation standards that fail to meet the requirements of high-quality-oriented development, the lack of scientific and efficient evaluation procedures and methods, and the insufficient mechanism that is not in step with giving incentives and allowing for and addressing mistakes. To further promote the evaluation of officials’ performance in the new era, the following suggestions are made. First, the high-quality development needs to be given more expression in the evaluation of officials’ performance. Second, the administrative management system reform needs to shore up the evaluation of officials’ performance. Third, the performance evaluation management system and organization structure need to be fleshed out. Fourth, relevant implementation standards and technological support need to be strengthened. Fifth, the evaluation results need to be tailored to the incentive mechanisms to motivate officials to fulfill their duties.

Key words: evaluation of officials’ performance, high-quality development, new development concepts

 
武平县| 霍山县| 睢宁县| 巴马| 交口县| 丰镇市| 永靖县| 日土县| 琼中| 淄博市| 西宁市| 奉化市| 扎囊县| 木里| 新绛县| 田阳县| 余庆县| 朝阳区| 沿河| 漠河县| 台州市| 东明县| 黎平县| 互助| 定州市| 资兴市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 通河县| 休宁县| 新昌县| 阿拉善左旗| 吉安市| 陆河县| 胶南市| 陈巴尔虎旗| 阳谷县| 台中市| 长垣县| 临潭县| 清水河县| 沅陵县|