Oil wealth may not mean Iraq will prosper ( 2003-08-11 14:24) (Agencies)
Iraq is swimming in oil, but anybody who thinks that such natural wealth
translates into a fat and happy middle class is in for a crude awakening.
Precious resources alone — whether oil or gold or diamonds — rarely raise
nations from poverty to prosperity. Countries usually become poorer, more
corrupt and more prone to coups, wars and tyranny than their less-endowed
neighbors, recent studies show.
"It's a big problem, this myth about oil — that if you have it, everybody is
going to be rich," said Terry Lynn Karl, a Stanford University political
scientist who studies developing nations that depend on the sale of their
natural resources.
Amid the violence and chaos in their country, many Iraqis look longingly to a
day when they can share the wealth that had been hoarded by ousted ruler Saddam
Hussein.
The Bush administration has promoted that notion in its fitful efforts to
pacify an impatient populace and quell attacks on the US-led occupation force.
But even if the administration meets its goals to have Iraq's battered,
looted oil infrastructure pumping petroleum at pre-war levels of 2.5 million
barrels a day early next year, some Iraqis are certain to be disappointed.
Washington wants to use those revenues to repair the damage done since the war,
not just write checks to Iraqis.
Oil exploration is enormously expensive, but once oil is found, it doesn't
require much labor to get out of the ground. Once flowing, it produces huge
revenues for governments.
Yet there is little precedent that enormous government oil wealth trickles
down and finds its way into improving education and health care, and
diversifying the economy to create jobs that don't rely on the swings in the oil
markets.
"The temptations are enormous," said Ron Gold, vice president of the
nonprofit, New York-based Petroleum Industry Research Foundation and author of a
recent report titled "Going Where the Oil is." "Where institutions are sturdy
the odds are that the oil bonanza can be had to enhance the country's welfare."
He cited Norway's distribution of its offshore oil wealth. But it is an
exception. Iraq has ethnic, religious and geographic factions that could be at
each other's throats over oil.
In Gold's study that used World Bank data gauging a nation's openness,
honesty and lawfulness, he found that 58 percent of the world's known oil
reserves are in countries that ranked in the bottom quarter of at least one of
the three categories.
And nearly half of the oil the US imported during the first three months of
this year came from 11 of the 12 low-ranking countries, Gold said.
Iraq has the second-biggest known oil reserves in the world — 112 billion
barrels — after its southern neighbor, Saudi Arabia. Yet even the world's
undisputed petropower, with a quarter of the world's known reserves, is finally
paying the price for failing to diversify a volatile economy that has caused per
capita income to plunge from $28,000 in 1983 to less than a fifth of that, said
Karl of Stanford University.
Venezuela, Iran, Libya, Angola, Qatar, Ecuador and Algeria have also seen per
capita wages plunge, along with widening gulfs between a rich minority and an
increasingly impoverished majority, she said.
Karl and policy analyst Ian Gary are co-authors of a 110-page analysis of the
impact of oil on developing nations and the potential for disaster — or, if
changes are made, of stunning success — that could result from a nascent oil
boom in sub-Saharan Africa.
A number of projects in poor, politically fragile countries such as Chad, Sao
Tome and Equatorial Guinea are expected to make the continent a potential
alternative to the Persian Gulf.
At the same time, new discoveries in the Caspian Sea are poised to make five
former Soviet republics significant oil exporters within the next five years.
Yet their human rights records are spotty, democracy remains elusive, and they
have been unable to agree on how to share what is estimated to be the
third-largest oil reserves on the planet.
"That's why we see this moment in time as a tremendous threat to these
countries, but also an enormous opportunity," Gary said.
The June report was sponsored by the humanitarian group Catholic Relief
Services. It is the latest salvo by a range of advocacy groups seeking to force
oil companies, the countries in which they are based and the governments they do
business with to disclose every dollar, dinar and ducat that changes hands, and
how the money is eventually used.
The multinational oil companies generally oppose mandatory disclosure
guidelines. British Prime Minister Tony Blair tried to get his government to
adopt such rules this year, but settled for voluntary guidelines that disclosure
advocates say are largely useless.
British Petroleum took the lead in disclosure two years ago, when it said it
would publish all the payments made to Angola for oil pumped from its waters,
which included a $100 million "signature bonus" to Angolan officials. The
government promptly threatened to cancel BP's contract.
Angola is considered one of the most corrupt countries in the world by
Transparency International, a watchdog group.
If oil companies contend they are playing fair, what do they have to hide?
"In the U.S. you have an open auction. But in these other places you're
competing, and you'd rather not show your hand," said Gold, the industry
analyst.
While President Bush dismissed Africa's importance to US interests
while campaigning for president, he has taken a keen interest in Africa since
the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and recently visited the continent.
The Catholic Relief Services report estimated that oil companies were
plunging $50 billion in foreign investment into sub-Saharan Africa's oil
industry.
Even more than the Middle East, the continent is riven with wars,
authoritarian regimes and ethnic and geographic rivalries. Thirty African
nations make up the bottom 35 of the U.N. Development Program's annual "misery"
index of terrible places to live.
Despite the dinar signs dancing in Iraq's eyes, few nations have spilled as
much blood over oil. Iraq's 1980-88 war with Iran cost an estimated half million
lives and began with Iraq's attempt to seize the oil-rich Iranian border region
of Khuzestan.
Saddam subsequently invaded Kuwait because the emirate was producing so much
oil that it was depressing global prices, leading to the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
Now, the United States is accused by critics of invading the country to get
at its oil.
But getting the oil infrastructure running is a problem. Smuggling into Syria
and sabotage of oil lines by anti-American guerrillas has slowed progress. In
northern Iraq, two rival groups of ethnic Kurds have skirmished for control of
the oil city of Kirkuk.
Still, oil companies are lining up for a crack at the crude that brings big
profits.