Hoon's high noon: UK minister back at Iraq inquiry ( 2003-09-22 09:19) (Agencies)
Prime Minister Tony Blair's embattled defense
minister and outgoing media aide face tough cross-examination on Monday in the
final week of a judicial inquiry which has cast doubt on Britain's case for war
in Iraq.
Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon and government communications director Alastair
Campbell, who announced his resignation last month, will be quizzed about a
pre-war Iraqi weapons dossier and their handling of a scientist who questioned
its central claim.
The inquiry into the suicide of weapons expert David Kelly has already
wreaked political damage on Blair. Kelly slashed his wrist after his
unauthorized meeting with a BBC reporter triggered a row between government and
public broadcaster.
Last week Blair's ruling Labour Party lost its first parliamentary
by-election in 15 years, a stinging setback which reflected the collapse of
public trust triggered by revelations at Lord Hutton's inquiry into Kelly's
death.
Ahead of Monday's cross-examination an opinion poll found that one in three
British voters thought Hoon should resign over his role in the affair.
The survey of 2,000 adults, conducted for the Financial Times by research
group Mori and published on the paper's Web Site, showed that one in five felt
Blair should quit also.
ANTI-WAR SENTIMENT
Intelligence chiefs have conceded to Hutton that a warning in Blair's
September 2002 dossier that Saddam Hussein could deploy weapons of mass
destruction at 45 minutes' notice was based only on information about
short-range and relatively small-scale battlefield munitions. That intelligence
came from a single source, quoting an Iraqi military officer.
To overcome anti-war sentiment within Labour, Blair based his case for
joining the U.S. invasion of Iraq on the "serious and current threat" from
Baghdad. But five months after the war no chemical or biological weapons have
been found in Iraq.
Campbell and Hoon are also likely to be asked about the government's handling
of Kelly after he admitted to his bosses that he may have been the source of an
explosive BBC report in May accusing Blair's government of "sexing up" the
dossier.
Hoon, singled out by British media as a likely government fall guy over the
Kelly affair, has played down his role in the strategy to name the scientist.
But the inquiry has shown that he attended a meeting where officials at his
ministry agreed to confirm Kelly was the suspected BBC source if his name was
put to them by journalists.
He also overruled advice from his top civil servant to shield Kelly from a
hostile parliamentary grilling just days before he took his life. Lawyers for
Kelly's family have their first chance to quiz Hoon over both issues on Monday.
Campbell, who told the inquiry last month he had "no input, output (or)
influence" on the inclusion of the 45-minute claim into the dossier, may be
asked why he asked senior intelligence officer John Scarlett to harden up the
assertion.
Scarlett himself returns for cross-examination at the inquiry on Tuesday,
along with Blair's official spokesmen. The BBC, which stood by its report in
public despite private doubts over "flawed reporting," will be in the dock on
Wednesday when Chairman Gavyn Davies is questioned.
Counsel to Hutton's inquiry James Dingemans will deliver a closing statement
on Thursday. But for Blair, the long wait for a final verdict will stretch on at
least until November.
Hutton warned last week there was no real prospect of delivering his final
report in October.