 Sean Boyne and student Ibrahim al-Marashi have attacked Tony Blair for using their reports to call for war against Iraq.
Mr Boyne, who works for military magazine Jane's Intelligence Review. Articles he wrote in 1997 were plagiarized for a 19-page intelligence document to add weight to the PM's warmongering. He said: "I don't like to think that anything I wrote has been used for an argument for war. I am concerned because I am against the war." The other main source was a thesis by post-graduate student, Ibrahim al-Marashi's research partly based on documents seized in the 1991 Gulf War, including typing and grammatical errors. After the dossier's origins were revealed, Mr Blair was accused. The fiasco has deeply damaged his attempts to win backing for military action. And Labour MP Glenda Jackson said: "It is another example of how the Government is attempting to mislead the country and Parliament. The PM's official spokesman rejected Ms Jackson's claims but admitted it had been a mistake not to acknowledge Mr al-Marashi's thesis in the dossier. He added: "The fact we used some of his work doesn't throw into question the accuracy of the document as a whole. This document is solid." The dossier had been praised by US Secretary of State Colin Powell in his speech to the UN Security Council. (Agencies) | 英國(guó)首相布萊爾近日受到了記者肖恩·博伊恩和研究生伊伯拉希姆·阿里·馬拉什的指責(zé)，他們對(duì)自己的論文被抄襲并用來號(hào)召挑起對(duì)伊拉克的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)表示強(qiáng)烈的不滿。 肖恩·博伊恩是軍事雜志《簡(jiǎn)氏軍事評(píng)論》的記者，他在1997年寫的文章經(jīng)過政府的"一番取舍"，竟搖身一變出現(xiàn)在了一份長(zhǎng)達(dá)19頁的政府文件中，為首相布萊爾的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)主張搖旗吶喊。  | | 29歲的研究生伊伯拉希姆·阿里·馬拉什 |
博伊恩說："我不愿意看到自己的東西被用來為戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)推波助瀾，我是反對(duì)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的。" 而這份政府文件的另一個(gè)主要來源是研究生伊伯拉希姆·阿里·馬拉什根據(jù)1991年海灣戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的文件寫成的一篇論文，連其中的拼寫和語法錯(cuò)誤都原封不動(dòng)地被照搬了上去。 抄襲事件被披露后，首相布萊爾的日子自然不那么好過了，之前他為爭(zhēng)取對(duì)伊拉克采取軍事行動(dòng)的支持而作諸多的努力，現(xiàn)在效果也大打折扣。 工黨議員格倫德·杰克遜對(duì)此評(píng)價(jià)說："這是另一例絕好的證明，說明了政府是如何試圖誤導(dǎo)整個(gè)國(guó)家和議會(huì)的。" 首相發(fā)言人則表示不同意杰克遜的觀點(diǎn)，但他承認(rèn)沒有在文件中指明出處是一個(gè)錯(cuò)誤。但他又說："我們?cè)谖募幸盟ㄒ敛Ｄ贰ぐ⒗铩ゑR拉什）的文章并沒有使文件的準(zhǔn)確性受影響。文件的論據(jù)是十分充足的。" 據(jù)悉，美國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)卿鮑威爾在聯(lián)合國(guó)安理會(huì)上發(fā)言時(shí)，還對(duì)英國(guó)政府的這份報(bào)告贊揚(yáng)有加呢。 （中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)站譯） |
Updated: 2003-02-10 01:00
