综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

Defying Alibaba was to HK credit in maintaining the rule of law

Updated: 2013-10-17 07:06

By Hong Liang(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small

In a rare show of guts, the Hong Kong government has told mainland e-commerce giant Alibaba to get lost if it can't cope with Hong Kong's listing rules.

Both the Securities and Exchanges Commission and Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd have made it clear that Hong Kong will not entertain the idea of bending its rules for Alibaba, or any other company, for that matter. The government has made similar comments on more than one occasion.

In an obvious attempt to embarrass Hong Kong, Alibaba CEO Jonathan Lu picked international news agency Reuters to air his displeasure, blaming the Hong Kong authorities for their lack of knowledge about Internet enterprises and declared that his company will be seeking a listing elsewhere, probably the United States. To this, all we can say is good for him and his company.

Hong Kong stands to gain much more by spurning Alibaba than the prospective income and questionable publicity it might have derived from caving in. By steadfastly refusing to compromise, Hong Kong has reaffirmed its unwavering commitment to upholding the rule of law, which is the single most important advantage that propelled the city to the rank of global financial center.

Outsiders may, from time to time have doubts, about the governance of Hong Kong. That's not surprising as the Hong Kong government is never too popular and its legislature is sometimes seen to be utterly dysfunctional. But the public trust in Hong Kong's judiciary in dispensing justice fairly and equitably is seldom questioned.

There were rare occasions when the enforcement arm of the law was seen to be unduly influenced by politics. The perceived collusion between government and big businesses, especially the large property developers, is always suspected by critics to have the effect of perverting justice.

But the high respect people have for the impartial courts of Hong Kong has remained undiminished. Neither the government nor powerful businesses are seen to enjoy any special privileges in the courtroom. And Hong Kong courts are never too afraid to hear cases against powerful interests in business and politics.

Alibaba's management obviously finds the Hong Kong regulatory environment based on the rule of law is too much of a constraint on its actions. It's therefore well-advised to take its listing elsewhere.

Losing Alibaba under such circumstances is not going to have any significant long-lasting impact on Hong Kong's status as an international financial center. Instead, it will further enhance Hong Kong's reputation as a well-regulated level playing field where transparency and consistency is assured.

Many Hong Kong politicians and business leaders have repeatedly stressed the importance of economic integration with the mainland. It's hard to know exactly what they meant by integration. But more and more people are beginning to realize that the pursuit of "integration" must not be carried out at the expense of the fundamental elements that make Hong Kong special.

If Alibaba, or any other company, wants to play, it must play according to the rules. That's what makes Hong Kong special.

The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

(HK Edition 10/17/2013 page1)

淳化县| 抚松县| 修武县| 西华县| 衡东县| 巴彦淖尔市| 新昌县| 凤庆县| 左权县| 长岭县| 文登市| 永修县| 涿鹿县| 炎陵县| 北票市| 固安县| 称多县| 东平县| 海林市| 湛江市| 弥渡县| 调兵山市| 云阳县| 鄂尔多斯市| 安泽县| 五常市| 绩溪县| 江油市| 鄂州市| 五河县| 耒阳市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 汶上县| 玉龙| 新安县| 佛坪县| 浪卡子县| 环江| 鲁甸县| 黄平县| 田东县|