综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Conflicts in Rural Governance

2015-12-02

By Zhao Shukai, Development Research Center of the State Council

Over the past ten years and more since the turn of the new century, China's rural development has kept a sound momentum, with farmers' income increased rapidly, public product supply enriched, and rural residents' wellbeing remarkably improved. However, with regard to governance, rapid development has not brought sound governance, or if we could say, the governance quality has failed to rise to an extent compatible with economic and social development; governance quality is instead worsened in many aspects. The author holds that such phenomenon of "strong development but weak governance" has not only puzzled the public in understanding China's development, but also intensified social anxiety and unrest, thus leading to public puzzle over China's future performance. According to the author, this is mainly reflected as follows: first, development and governance are imbalanced. Currently, unsound performance in rural governance is mainly, viewing from the social perspective, demonstrated through intensified rural social conflicts and increased complaints by farmers against township government. As regards the government, the relationship between different levels of government has become rather tense, with less trust between various levels of governments as well as inadequate cooperation among them. Second, there is an intrinsic logical conflict with the system. The way to find out the reason for the occurrence and evolvement of China's social conflicts should focus on the government system itself. And third, system conflicts are chiefly reflected in the following four aspects: the system conflict relating to budget management, the system conflict concerning official management, the system conflict pertinent to government performance and accountability, and the system conflict between township government and primary-level self-governance.

 
For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
当雄县| 常山县| 邳州市| 璧山县| 巴里| 华容县| 聂荣县| 青州市| 疏勒县| 鄂州市| 天峻县| 农安县| 白水县| 图木舒克市| 和静县| 开鲁县| 望江县| 绩溪县| 淳安县| 新干县| 蕲春县| 宁都县| 调兵山市| 荣成市| 徐汇区| 宁德市| 金寨县| 成安县| 清水县| 义马市| 浑源县| 敦煌市| 正阳县| 喀喇| 保康县| 文化| 晋州市| 潜江市| 博兴县| 涟水县| 弋阳县|