综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Publications> Articles

Potential Risks in Local Government Investment and Financing Platforms Call for Transformation

2017-02-17

 

By Xu Pengcheng, DRC

2016-12-29

For a long time, local government investment and financing platform companies have played an important role in China’s economic growth whereas their development is accompanied with potential risks. As a result, it is a major and imminent task to make transformation of these platform companies.

First, current performance. To resist financial crisis in 2008 and boost local economy, local governments in China are encouraged to establish platform companies to attract banking credit, issue corporate bonds and medium-term notes and broaden financing channels by financial appropriations, land-use right transfer and equity investment. According to the motions made at the National People’s Congress and the report by the Ministry of Finance, the debt balance of local governments across the country reached respectively 16 trillion yuan in 2014 and 17.18 trillion yuan in 2016.

Second, main existing problems. 1. Inappropriate functions have left these companies vulnerable in independent management if the government does not provide support. They lack clear debt liability and are overloaded in operation. 2. Internal management is not standardized, including the composition of personnel, sources of funds and governance structure. 3. Inability in debt payment due to land revenue decline and a long cycle of fund return. 4. Improper regulations for company performance. 5. Imperfect legal systems. 6. Great difficulties in local debt-to-equity swap.

Third, existing risks. 1. Single source of funds and dependence on land revenue will trigger financial risks for platform companies. 2. The non-standardized credit rating and loan audit will lead to bank credit risks. 3. Local governments would bear financial risks as debtors and guarantors. 4. Economic fluctuations often exert a leverage effect in debts. Meanwhile, as important assets are often associated with land mortgage, local governments would have to push up housing prices, thus resulting in economic structural malformations.

 

For more detailed information, please refer to here.

 
新化县| 洛阳市| 曲阜市| 海城市| 诸城市| 余姚市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 乐都县| 利辛县| 五指山市| 三亚市| 钦州市| 万载县| 调兵山市| 香格里拉县| 许昌市| 阜阳市| 姜堰市| 鄂托克前旗| 宝坻区| 特克斯县| 桃园县| 文水县| 宜宾市| 莱州市| 应城市| 个旧市| 嘉兴市| 威信县| 阿巴嘎旗| 兴山县| 淳化县| 尚志市| 连平县| 屏南县| 疏附县| 蕲春县| 林芝县| 梨树县| 华安县| 县级市|