综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

The US as a global risk generator

By Kevin P. Gallagher | China Daily | Updated: 2013-07-01 09:27

However, when the last financial crisis hit there was such a flight of capital out of emerging markets and back into the US that many of those positions were rapidly unwound - to the great detriment of those economies. Such are the massive - and global - transmission effects of today's tightly integrated financial markets.

Never relenting, these same FX derivatives market operators got very busy again right in the wake of the global financial crisis. Hedge funds and big banks engaged in the carry trade. They borrowed in US dollars at very low interest rates and then invested in foreign currencies in a broad range of countries, from the ROK, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico to South Africa, Indonesia and Thailand. Financial professionals, that as those running hedge funds and banks are, then built FX derivatives that shorted the dollar and went long on those currencies.

This fueled exchange rate appreciation and created asset bubbles that are part of the reason for the slowdown in emerging markets. Now that the Fed is looking to wind down its easing policies, capital is fleeing emerging markets again, causing exchange rates to depreciate and debt burdens to rise.

By now, it is a familiar story. Financial engineering, largely by US-owned companies, generates serious blowback in the real economy - and hurt themselves too in the process. Citigroup, a too-big-to-fail bank, may lose up to $7 billion in FX derivatives markets if the dollar appreciates as capital flies back to the US.

The next regulatory blow may hit any day. The CFTC and the SEC are now considering exempting the same foreign subsidiaries and branches of hedge funds and big banks headquartered or with stakes in the US that have been packaging derivatives overseas.

This would be disastrous for emerging markets and developing countries attempting to maintain financial stability for development. To their credit, the ROK and Brazil both have put in place their own regulations on FX derivatives, but emerging markets alone cannot carry the burden of regulating a $4 trillion-per-day market.

Gensler has said that, if these regulations are swapped out of rule making, hedge funds can evade the rules "by setting up shop in an offshore locale, even if it's not much more than a tropical island P.O. Box." Gensler needs a majority of commissioners to help him plug this loophole by July 12. Time is running out. The world cannot afford to create major loopholes that could threaten the global financial system yet again.

The author is co-director of Boston University's Global Economic Governance Initiative and co-chair of the Pardee Task Force For Regulating Global Capital Flows and Development, and a regular contributor to The Globalist.

The Globalist

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
惠安县| 萝北县| 莱芜市| 美姑县| 陵川县| 轮台县| 琼海市| 滁州市| 莱芜市| 偃师市| 武陟县| 兴化市| 高邑县| 青海省| 湘阴县| 池州市| 西平县| 凤翔县| 无为县| 万源市| 青岛市| 浦东新区| 牟定县| 文安县| 阿巴嘎旗| 新余市| 修水县| 调兵山市| 周至县| 怀远县| 张掖市| 改则县| 宁都县| 遵化市| 乐清市| 揭西县| 芮城县| 天津市| 铜川市| 砀山县| 汕尾市|