综合一区欧美国产,99国产麻豆免费精品,九九精品黄色录像,亚洲激情青青草,久久亚洲熟妇熟,中文字幕av在线播放,国产一区二区卡,九九久久国产精品,久久精品视频免费

WORLD> Europe
EU takes different approach to financial crisis
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-03-22 09:24


British Prime Minister Gordon Brown (L) and Foreign Secretary David Miliband attend a press conference held after the close of the two-day European Union spring summit in Brussels, capital of Belgium, March 20, 2009. [Xinhua] 

Instead of increasing economic incentives, the EU is clearly more interested in strengthening the international financial supervision and reform of the international financial institutions, in order to better guard against a repeat of the financial crisis.

Related readings:
 EU leaders agree to lend 75 billion euros to IMF
 EU agrees on deal for pipelines, carbon capture
 EU leaders reject more stimulus plan
 EU summit focuses on economic stimulus

On the eve of the EU summit, Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy wrote a letter to the Czech EU presidency and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barros, emphasizing that the EU common position at the London summit should focus on building a new international financial system. Their position has been taken by all EU leaders.

In a long list of the EU common position, the leaders devoted much space to the strengthening of international financial regulation and reform of international financial institutions.

As a general principle, the EU wants supervision and regulation of all sectors and products that may lead to risks in the financial markets -- hedge funds, credit rating agencies, credit derivatives, tax havens, executive pay, corporate capital requirements and accounting standards.

The EU supports reform of the IMF to adapt it to the current global economic pattern. Given the growing weight of emerging economies in the global economy, the EU favors the redistribution of IMF voting rights to give emerging economies more say. The EU leaders also agreed to provide the IMF with 75 billion euros to increase its capacity.

Despite the common position, how far the EU can go in terms of international financial institution reform remains unclear. First of all, a threat comes from the United States. Analysts have pointed out that the United States, by giving emphasis to economic stimulus, was trying to distract the attention of EU on supervision and regulation of international financial institutions.

As the prime source of the financial crisis, the laisser-faire approach of the United States has been under fire. Washington also wants supervision and oversight, but it may not be in complete agreement with the EU as to what extent regulation shall be strengthened.

Secondly, there is doubt about how seriously the EU is considering giving more powers to emerging economies and developing countries in key international financial institutions.

At a G20 finance ministers' and central bankers' meeting on March 14, Brazil, Russia, India and China -- known as "BRIC" countries -- called for immediate measures to expand the four nations' powers in the IMF. There seemed to be disagreements even within the EU's big three -- Britain, France and Germany. Germany and France now also worry that Britain might be leaning toward the United States at the London summit, thus undermining the common EU position.

大田县| 上犹县| 正安县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 政和县| 佛坪县| 扬中市| 嘉峪关市| 伊宁县| 蓬安县| 油尖旺区| 贞丰县| 张家港市| 平陆县| 孝昌县| 上饶县| 深圳市| 余庆县| 贵德县| 泗洪县| 濉溪县| 巴青县| 会东县| 名山县| 岫岩| 临洮县| 汕尾市| 锡林浩特市| 连州市| 崇仁县| 霍州市| 广丰县| 清水河县| 石屏县| 砚山县| 新龙县| 清涧县| 孝昌县| 乌什县| 长汀县| 恭城|